Healing Science Policy Institute
Launch May 9th & 10th
The launch of the Healing Science Policy Institute is a momentous event, marking the establishment of a new scientific-medical national coalition. This emerging community is defined by the need to present contrasting narratives, have open debates and discussions, and support integrity-driven scientists and physicians.
It’s the collective effort of over 6000 doctors, scientists, practitioners, and citizen leaders that is leading the Healing Science Policy Institute to launch right across from the White House. We stand for truth, transparency, and accountability in our government health agencies, and your leadership is crucial in this endeavor.
DC-based policy think tank organizes to assist with HHS restructuring efforts from the largest public list of reputable Kennedy-supportive physicians, scientists, and academics who are grassroot leaders standing up, coming together, and flying in from all over the country.
We are seeking to engage the public, modeling transparency and openness, presenting problems and solutions to our currently broken systems of caring, evidence on novel or controversial topics that are not mainstream, and ultimately help America heal!
Why This Matters
The American people have endured censorship, silencing, and medical policies shaped by one-sided narratives championing the exclusivity of science. The launch of the Healing Science Policy Institute is a crucial step towards challenging this status quo. It marks the beginning of a new era of healthcare and healing, led by those who never gave up on truth or people.
Looking back through history, every single revolution on this planet has been caused by normal, simple people standing up for the truth and doing simple things to change the world. We have this delusion that big problems require big solutions. And that’s why we’ve been hoaxed into believing that all these organizations and pharmaceutical companies are doing the right thing.
Why is Change So Difficult?
A brilliant book is “How to Change When Change Is Hard.” The authors boiled cultural changes down to three things that explain why specific movements fail.
The first is that the movement has to be logical. In the case of the Healing Science Policy movement, we are challenging the narrative that a one-sided view advances science.
The second is the emotional component. You have to motivate the brain, specifically the limbic system, so that “logic can ride on top of the elephant.” The elephant has to be motivated. That’s where many people sometimes put all their ducks in a row, but it becomes purely emotional. When movements make no logical sense, it’s just a big ball of emotion. It has energy, but it’ll just go nowhere without logic. If you have these two things together, change starts to take shape. But it’s still not enough.
The third element, which is that you have to be able to map the actions on one piece of paper for people to follow.
So, if it’s logical and motivating, and there are steps to take, change can be initiated. We saw this with people like RFK Jr. leading the HHS position and Dr. Mehmet Oz the CMS. Everybody needs to be talking about this.
There’s a bigger goal than just supporting RFK Jr. There’s a plan to build a whole back end where we would educate people and create an entire network of scientists worldwide. We would “connect the dots for people” to make it accessible so that it would change the world.
Here are the defining Visions of the Healing Sciences Policy Institute
(1) Centralize academic rebuttal letter signers into a single policy think tank based in DC for scientists, physicians, clinical practitioners, and citizen practitioners to have a space, have a voice, be organized, and have actual influence in DC and the world.
(2) Teach fundamental legal rights, healthcare rights, and civics education/engagement, redistributing access to knowledge to crucial, accurate information through experiential learning, events, and conferences. This also helps point and connect individuals to the resources they need to heal and thrive.
(3) Bring physicians and scientists in support of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who has not gone mainstream, signed the letter, retained their licenses/credentials, and have not been publicly discredited. Allow these individuals to introduce stories and ground-breaking findings that integrate and intersect with different modes of healing succinctly on a national/worldwide stage. Allow citizen practitioners (patients) to share their stories of healing unconventionally.
(4) Truly look at controversial research findings, data, and statistics from all angles while reintroducing public debates on past censored issues/information/data.
(5) Legally support physicians and healthcare providers seeking to reform healthcare from inside the system and create better patient care experiences. Encourage true advocacy for each patient based on personalized and observational data.
(6) Reframe what healing can look like, reaffirming the various ways to heal and the need for accurate information and informed consent while reaffirming patient autonomy, choice, dignity, and personal relationship to providers (reframing healthcare ethics at the base core level).
(7) Reshape healthcare system models (insurance, quality controls, legal/regulatory, etc.) to incentivize and prioritize the patient-provider relationship based on empowerment, trauma-informed care, freedom, nonmaleficence first, then beneficence ethics, and trust.
(8) Restore the integrity, licenses, and reputation of physicians and scientists who have been publicly discredited for sounding the alarm on specific issues such as healthcare culture changes, licensing standards, and organizational leadership. Follow suit and become pressured to change.
(9) Produce comprehensive HHS policy briefings not based on compromise but based on a rigorous assessment of all available data and research on various topic issues and the regulatory language/codes attached to them. Provide policy briefing based on legal knowledge and understanding that agencies have the power to interpret their statutes and regulations so long as they can substantially justify it.
(10) Ensure that everyone who contributes (financially, through volunteering talents/time, or as a future* paid staff) feels part of a growing community, feels connected, has the ability/access to meeting in person, retains the spirit of giving/generosity, and remains motivated to make things right!
Presentations will be TED-style talks with fully open media questions after each talk.
Speakers and topics include:
Gennaro D’urso, PhD (need for open scientific debates)
Vatsal Thakkar, MD (lack of open medical debates)
Howard Saft, MD (issues with medical research)
Brian Peskin, PhD (inflammation and seed oils)
Robert Rowens, MD
Howard Robins, DPM (ozone & medical uses)
Christopher Cassells, MD (fixing CMS)
Johnathan Edwards, MD (pain, needles, taboos, trust)
Craig Wax, DO (patient ownership)
Laurie A. Couture, MEd, LCMHC (psychiatric drug failures and harms), and many others alongside citizen voices and stories to support the restructuring and redesign of healthcare.
